IR35 is complicated set of rules that applies to contractors.
Many companies will award contracts to related and associated businesses, are these subject to IR35?
Paragraph 3(1) and (2) Schedule 12 Finance Act 2000 / Section 51(1) and (2)
Chapter 8 ITEPA 2003
Regulation 5(2)(a) SI 2000 No. 727
The conditions of liability are not met if the intermediary is an associated company of the client by reason of the two companies both being under the control of the worker, or the worker and one or more persons.
When considering who has control of both companies you have to consider the minimum irreducible shareholdings.
Mrs J owns all of the shares in Holdco Ltd, which in turn owns all of the shares in Tradeco Ltd. She works for Tradeco Ltd under a service agreement between Tradeco Ltd and Holdco Ltd. Both client and intermediary companies are under the control of Mrs J so the conditions of liability are not met and therefore, the legislation does not apply.
Mr K and Mr L each own 50% of the shares in Holdco Ltd and Tradeco Ltd. They both work for Tradeco Ltd under a service agreement between Tradeco Ltd and Holdco Ltd. Neither Mr K nor Mr L controls both companies on their own and both their shareholdings have to be taken into account in establishing control. Therefore Holdco Ltd and Tradeco Ltd are under the control of Mr K and Mr L. The conditions of liability are not met and no deemed payment arises.
Ms M owns 60% of the shares in Holdco Ltd and Tradeco Ltd. Mr N and Mr O own a further 20% of the shares each. Ms M has control of both companies on her own. Therefore the conditions of liability will not be met with respect to her services. However, the exception will not apply to any services provided by Mr N and Mr O.
Mr A, Mrs B, Mr C and Ms D who are unconnected each own 25% of the ordinary shares in both Holdco Ltd (intermediary) and Manuco Ltd (client). The following combinations could control both companies – Mr A, Mrs B and Mr C; Mr A, Mrs B and Ms D; Mr A, Mr C and Ms D; Mrs B, Mr C and Ms D. Consequently, in relation to each worker’s engagement, the companies are associated companies as they are both under the control of the worker and other persons.
Mr A, Mrs B, Mr C and Ms D who are unconnected each own 25% of the ordinary shares in Holdco Ltd (intermediary) but Mr A, Mrs B and Mr C each own one-third of the ordinary shares of Manuco Ltd (client). The combinations which could control Holdco Ltd are as shown in Example 4 above. The combinations which could control Manuco Ltd are Mr A and Mrs B; Mr A and Mr C; and Mrs B and Mr C. As none of these combinations control Holdco Ltd the companies are not associated companies for the purposes of the legislation.